• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Spencer vs. Jonson"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Terry Pratchett's "Wyrd Sisters""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1684  Tuesday, 3 July 2001

From:           Takashi Kozuka <shaxpeare@hotmail.com>
Date:           Monday, 02 Jul 2001 20:25:50
Subject:        Re: Why Shakespeare Conflicts

I should also add that those who have misunderstood my argument need to
understand that there are two issues here: (1) the whole argument about
"universality" (whether of Shakespeare or not) and (2) how to present an
argument. These are separate issues, though they can be connected. My
posting was to ask the validity of logicality in Sam's argument (that
is, it was dealing with issue (2)), and this is where Karen's point
comes in. Thus I have never insisted that universality should be
understood empirically.

This, of course, is *not* to say that I believe in Shakespeare's
universality. (I don't.) As I mentioned, it is a separate issue.

Best wishes,
Takashi Kozuka

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>

• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Spencer vs. Jonson"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Terry Pratchett's "Wyrd Sisters""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]