![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Nay, very pale.
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 03/24/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.0707 Saturday, 24 March 2001 From: Jack Hettinger <Jack_Hettinger@mail.msj.edu> Date: Wednesday, 21 Mar 2001 09:49:54 -0500 Subject: Nay, very pale. Friends, For a long time I have wondered about the significance of Horatio's response to Hamlet that the "countenance" of the Ghost was "very pale" (1.2.236: Bevington). Hamlet: What looked he, frowningly? Horatio: A countenance more in sorrow than in anger. Hamlet: Pale or red? Horation: Nay, very pale. Neither Bevington, nor the Riverside, nor the Norton gloss this detail. Walter McGee in The Elizabethan Hamlet (1987) claims that pale is the color of an infernal ghost (p. 133) but does not seem to document this claim. (I've read the book thoroughly but certainly could have missed a citation, for which I do apologize.) I've read numerous other books and articles, as well as a dissertation on ghosts in Renaissance English drama, to no avail. Can anyone help? Many thanks. Jack _______________________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>
|
|
|||||