![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Re: Tragic Hero
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 03/21/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.0691 Wednesday, 21 March 2001 From: Paul E. Doniger <pdoniger@snet.net> Date: Tuesday, 20 Mar 2001 19:58:39 -0800 Subject: Re: Tragic Hero Mari Bonomi, in responding to my comment "that Julius Caesar is really about Brutus, despite its title" added that "Shakespeare is in good company: the play we call Antigone today is the tragedy of Creon, not of Antigone... but I guess "Creon's Downfall" doesn't cut it as a title either <wry smile>." I have to admit to being somewhat ambivalent on this question. I generally think of Antigone as the "tragic hero(ine)," rather than Creon; however, I do sometimes think that perhaps I am wrong after all (especially when I look at Anouilh's version of the play. Then again, I find myself turning back to Antigone, who does suffer death for her "failure" to compromise her principles (in the original, a religious principle). Perhaps it is a play with two tragic heroes. Perhaps the real hero is an idea: the courage of one's convictions, or some such thing. Is there anything like this in Shakespeare? I can't think of a play, outside perhaps _Anthony & Cleopatra_ with two tragic heroes. Paul E. Doniger
|
|
|||||