![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2000: Re: "Alarbes"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 10/05/00
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.1882 Thursday, 5 October 2000.
[1] From: Marcus Dahl <Marcusdahl@aol.com>
Date: Wednesday, 4 Oct 2000 12:49:19 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
[2] From: Sophie Masson <smasson@northnet.com.au>
Date: Thursday, 5 Oct 2000 08:38:41 +1000
Subj: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
[3] From: Abdulla Al-Dabbagh <al-dabbagh@rocketmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Marcus Dahl <Marcusdahl@aol.com>
Date: Wednesday, 4 Oct 2000 12:49:19 EDT
Subject: 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Comment: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Without knowing the particular passage "Alarbes" could be a misprint of
"Arabes" given the nonspecific non-Europeanism of "Wild Africans" and
"Lawless..."
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sophie Masson <smasson@northnet.com.au>
Date: Thursday, 5 Oct 2000 08:38:41 +1000
Subject: 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Comment: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Could they be the Alans, close relatives of the Scythians--Caucasian
people? The Alans were famous for their lawlessness but generally good
fighting skills. The Romans also used them as mercenaries; there were
Alan garrisons in England as well as other places. However they also
enthusiastically changed sides and attacked the Romans.
Sophie Masson
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Abdulla Al-Dabbagh <al-dabbagh@rocketmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Comment: Re: SHK 11.1873 "Alarbes"
Morphologically the word is too close to the Arabic word "Al-Arab",
meaning the Arabs, to refer to anyone else, which also fits the context.
Regards, Abdulla al-Dabbagh
|
|
|||||