![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2000: Re: Sonnet 20
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 04/13/00
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0782 Thursday, 13 April 2000. From: Tom Reedy <treedy@cooke.net> Date: Wednesday, 12 Apr 2000 14:07:56 -0500 Subject: 11.0765 Re: Sonnet 20 Comment: Re: SHK 11.0765 Re: Sonnet 20 Judith Matthews Craig writes >In the interests of "unprotecting Shakespeare" I would like to see an >argument advanced rather than an ad hominem attack. Some of us >"prickless" pricks thought that the "universality of Shakespeare" meant >that he was more interested in the impact of time on people and events >or perhaps the value of universal ideas as they applied to the universal >human condition as depicted in poetry rather than in the depiction of a >mindless blob of gutter sexuality common to any bestial human willing to >indulge it. > > Judy Craig Oh, boy. Here we go again. I'll pass on this one; it does get tiresome after a while. Tom Reedy
|
|
|||||