![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2000: Re: Shakespeare Prequel Contest
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 02/22/00
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0380 Tuesday, 22 February 2000. From: Clifford Stetner <clifford.stetner@gte.net> Date: Monday, 21 Feb 2000 18:29:23 -0500 Subject: 11.0369 Re: Shakespeare Prequel Contest Comment: Re: SHK 11.0369 Re: Shakespeare Prequel Contest >...I am constantly amazed at the number of writers who consider themselves >"serious" in their intent and yet are so desperate to get that byline >that they'd jump at a crumb like this... As a member of the latest generation of Shakespeareans struggling through grad school, I am not amazed. Leaving aside the question of publishing one's poetry, those of us who have gotten our first glimpse of the marketplace in Shakespeare criticism may develop a suspicion that there is a considerable glut of other serious writers trying to write serious things about Shakespeare. As is becoming clear among the various adjunct, part-timer, and grad school lists to which I subscribe, the University system does not base its recruitment on the demands of the marketplace, either in teaching or publication. In a system which tells you first: "publish or perish," and later: "publish a book that sells to Barnes and Noble customers or perish," it should not surprise anyone that writers should be subjected to the same forms of exploitation as junior instructors or interns at radio stations (i.e. work for nothing now, and it will lead to money later). Surveying the field, however, it is hard to believe that anyone other than the Harold Bloom and Stephan Greenblatt superstars are going to make any kind of living at this particular form of doctoring. So why should I hoard up my intellectual property for a future dream of notoriety which looks ever more like a lottery ticket? By tossing it away on the breeze, at least my ideas will become associated with my name and may open up further opportunities. Clifford Stetner
|
|
|||||