![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2000: Re: A Hypertext Model
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 02/21/00
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0363 Monday, 21 February 2000.
[1] From: Peter M. McCluskey <pmcclusk@frank.mtsu.edu>
Date: Friday, 18 Feb 2000 14:48:32 -0600
Subj: Re: A Hypertext Model
[2] From: Scott Crozier <CROZISSS@stmichaels.vic.edu.au>
Date: Monday, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:22 +1100
Subj: RE: SHK 11.0355 A Hypertext Model
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter M. McCluskey <pmcclusk@frank.mtsu.edu>
Date: Friday, 18 Feb 2000 14:48:32 -0600
Subject: Re: A Hypertext Model
Tom Dale Keever muses, "I also note that Eliot fought all his life,
successfully, to keep his poetry from appearing is such a vulgar form as
a paperback book. I wonder how he would feel if he knew he'd been
published in cyberspace."
Since we've been discussing copyrights and the internet, we might also
ask how Harcourt Brace & Company feel about this unusual website....
(By the way, I'm disappointed that the site doesn't offer a link the
Allman Brothers' album "Eat a Peach.")
Pete McCluskey
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Scott Crozier <CROZISSS@stmichaels.vic.edu.au>
Date: Monday, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:22 +1100
Subject: 11.0355 A Hypertext Model
Comment: RE: SHK 11.0355 A Hypertext Model
Although this is not the subject of our list, I would be more than a
little worried if someone used the Prufrock hypertext as a model for
hypertext on any Shakespeare. Merely making visual images that work
better in words is a waste of technology. Surely the worth of hypertext
lies in its ability to make connections of cognition that would
otherwise not be possible. Illustrating poetic images through hypertext
, I think, places concrete limits on a reading rather than offering
means to explore ideas further.
Regards,
Scott Crozier
|
|
|||||