![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2000: Banquo etc.
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 01/14/00
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0082 Friday, 14 January 2000. From: David Evett <d.evett@csuohio.edu> Date: Thursday, 13 Jan 2000 16:15:13 -0500 Subject: Banquo etc. Karen Peterson-Krantz may be right in thinking that "individuals who have no concept of play-acting have existed, and do exist, everywhere." But such people are not mostly the simpletons she presents the rude mechanicals of Athens as being, who categorically cannot distinguish between make believe and whatever it is that we usually call reality. A great deal of evidence suggests that the ability to image internally and then to speak and otherwise enact fictive roles and situations is utterly essential to normal human social and linguistic development and activity; only our ability to conceive and say the thing that is not so permits us, for instance, to understand that the person who just left the room may soon return, or to follow up the memory of those sweet, cold plums in the refrigerator with a trip down the stairs to get and eat them. Various kinds of mental illness, from autism to multiple personality disorder, seem to involve incomplete or improper functioning of these complex mental abilities. Indeed, Snug and Starveling and Bottom would not strike us as funny if we did not all have those abilities to begin with-abilities that all those characters, at least in their direct dealings with each other, have in perfectly normal ways; their anxieties about the ladies of Theseus' court arise from an excess of imagination, not a deficiency of it. That being the case, however, it is still worth considering deeply, as Sean has being trying to get us to do, why we find such satisfaction in imagining for ourselves or hiring authors and actors to imagine for us the internal lives of antisocial beings like Macbeth. David Evett
|
|
|||||