![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: Henry V (and Branagh)
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/23/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2281 Thursday, 23 December 1999. From: Tom Reedy <treedy@cooke.net> Date: Wednesday, 22 Dec 1999 10:39:52 -0600 Subject: 10.2274 Re: Henry V (and Branagh) Comment: Re: SHK 10.2274 Re: Henry V (and Branagh) >>I suspect, though admittedly without any substantial evidence, that if >>Shakespeare were alive today, he would be in the film business, where >>significant money is, and would recognize that the entire scope of >>entertainment in today's modern world makes unnecessary a three and a >>half-hour stage production. > >I have to respectfully submit that I believe Shakespeare wrote for other >motives than money. > >Judy Craig And I have to respectfully submit that I believe that those who write for the cinema today also write for other motives than money, although money is certainly one. Shakespeare was a human being, not a god, and therefore had mixed motives for his actions, as all humans do. This art/money motive argument tries to force Shakespeare into the role of either a tin Jesus or an idiot savant, and is made by those who would have him a much less complicated person than any of the characters he created. Tom Reedy
|
|
|||||