![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: Mrs. Bottom
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/22/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2276 Wednesday, 22 December 1999.
[1] From: Judith Matthews Craig <je-mc@apex2000.net>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Dec 1999 22:06:04 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2201 Re: Mrs. Bottom
[2] From: Judith Matthews Craig <je-mc@apex2000.net>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Dec 1999 22:54:12 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2235 Re: Mrs. Bottom
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Judith Matthews Craig <je-mc@apex2000.net>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Dec 1999 22:06:04 -0600
Subject: 10.2201 Re: Mrs. Bottom
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2201 Re: Mrs. Bottom
>Terence Hawkes muses:
>
>>Much more fetching was the restoration of
>>the play's pivotal character, Mrs. Bottom. Indeed, it seemed to me that
>>the intellectual toughness beneath the slight lyric grace of her lines
>>had palpable puddling potential. I have always felt that this lady,
>>last seen in Hollywood, could tell us a great deal about Gertrude.
>
>Could she tell us something about Innogen?
>
>Cheers,
>Seán.
>God, I hope not, Sean!
>
>Cheers,
>Carol Barton
Hey EMLS--God forbid!!
Judy Craig
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Judith Matthews Craig <je-mc@apex2000.net>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Dec 1999 22:54:12 -0600
Subject: 10.2235 Re: Mrs. Bottom
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2235 Re: Mrs. Bottom
Terence Hawkes writes:
<did Lady
>Macbeth really faint?
No, I think she is running for the US Senate. (Oops, I thought this was
an SAA in-joke of some years past).
Cheeringly,
JMC aka Go With The Flo or What Happened to JC?
|
|
|||||