![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: Quartos and Folios
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/22/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2266 Wednesday, 22 December 1999. From: Clifford Stetner <cstetner@liu.edu> Date: Tuesday, 21 Dec 1999 10:53:32 -0500 Subject: 10.2247 Re: Quartos and Folios Comment: Re: SHK 10.2247 Re: Quartos and Folios I am an outside observer in matters of textual scholarship, but I do try to keep up with the latest science. As analogies from contemporary science go, perhaps Heisenberg's uncertainty principle has something to offer. It demonstrates that there are limits built into the physical universe beyond which observation (and therefore human science) cannot go. Specifically, it implies that, if an object of study is changed by observation itself, then its unobserved state can never be observed. Objects of human agency such as written or printed texts are subject to a similar principle of uncertainty. No scientific method can apply, because the possibility always exists that the text in question is an intentional fabrication designed to stupefy literary critics. Although a similar condition might be argued for physical sciences, it is only necessary to banish one malignant supreme intelligence from the physical world. The nature of literature lends itself too easily to forgery and fakery to provide any sort of empirical material. Textual scholars often seem to suppose a work to be a memorial reconstruction because it isn't good enough to be Shakespeare. I think that it is useful to imagine that the first quarto of Hamlet is Shakespeare's, and the second is a collaborative work up after years of performance. Perhaps it was Shakespeare the individual who was the mediocrity, and the consortium who produced the great "finished" works (n.b. this last is meant as a kind of Einsteinian thought experiment, not a theory). I would like to add that it is exciting to see these debates in progress rather than only reading their published outcomes. Clifford Stetner
|
|
|||||