![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: Age of Awareness
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/03/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2133 Friday, 3 December 1999. From: Nancy Charlton <nancjbc@snip.net> Date: Thursday, 02 Dec 1999 19:35:49 -0500 Subject: 10.2093 Re: Age of Awareness Comment: Re: SHK 10.2093 Re: Age of Awareness Reg Grouse wrote: >Language, you [Terence Hawkes] claim, is not music. True, but verse speaking is akin to >singing without tonal range. It is this musical quality in Shakespeare's >verse which I believe first attracted me to his works. This reminds me of a time in the mid-80s when I helped chaperone a busload of highschoolers including my daughter to a performance by a traveling French theatre, who performed an abbreviated version of Moliere's Tartuffe. While our kids at least were well prepped by their Friench teacher (and the chaperoning moms too), and had read at least part of the play in some depth, they/we were far from expert in listening to the French. Nevertheless, the play was riveting. Talk about emotional reactions! It was the acting, but it was also the verbal delivery, that transcended the merely cognitive aspect of the language. This was the most intense experience I have ever had of hearing the communication of language as sound the equivalent of music. No opera-not even Cosi fan tutte- comes close. True, we were prepared to listen and enjoy and catch as much of the French as possible, but we were not prepared to be enthralled by a superior performance and an extraordinary experience of theatre. Now, I couldn't quote you a line from Tartuffe to save my soul, but I will never lose the feeling that performance evoked. It came from the acting, certainly; but the 'music' of that speech was inseparable from that acting. Everyone went around speaking in alexandrines for several days afterwards! Nancy Charlton Then of Bellingham WA PS. No, I don't know the name of the theatre company.
|
|
|||||