![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: Age of Awareness
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 11/23/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2063 Tuesday, 23 November 1999. From: Terence Hawkes <hawkest@compuserve.com> Date: Monday, 22 Nov 1999 13:18:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Age of Awareness Comment: SHK 10.2046 Re: Age of Awareness Reg Grouse writes, 'the seductive beauty of his verse . . . that musical, abstract quality which needs no intellectual but only an emotional response' It's precisely the distinction you presuppose between an 'intellectual' and an 'emotional response' that strikes me as dangerous as well as mistaken. Language is not music. It has a vital discursive dimension in which the intellect is intricately and irrevocably involved. 'Sound patterns' may aid and abet that dimension, but they can scarcely be separated from or substituted for it. Nor are they in themselves admirable. They occur randomly in the telephone directory as readily as in the works of the Bard. Something which is 'only an emotional response' to language is not an adequate response at all, and we have no business encouraging it in children. Pop songs will do that for us. I repeat, Fie! T. Hawkes
|
|
|||||