![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1999: Re: R&J in Lust?
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 03/01/99
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0334 Monday 1 March 1999. From: Robin Hamilton <robin.hamilton@gmtnet.co.uk> Date: Friday, 26 Feb 1999 20:41:36 -0000 Subject: 10.0324 Re: R&J in Lust? Comment: Re: SHK 10.0324 Re: R&J in Lust? >>Love >>in opposition to lust is a recurrent obsession of the tragedies, except >>in some ways, Romeo and Juliet, though one could argue that their whole >>death-marked love is corrupt. > >I write: > >How could one argue this? > >Paul S. Rhodes While the love/lust opposition just +might+ apply to the earlier plays (though I doubt this -- it's never as clear as the opposition between the Dark Lady and the Young Man in the _Sonnets_, and even there it's not as simple as a simple opposition), it collapses completely when we come to _Antony and Cleopatra_, where we have the reductive Romans ratting on about Antony's 'lust', while what we as audience see is much more complex. Robin Hamilton
|
|
|||||