![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1998: Re: All-Male H5
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 07/16/98
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0660 Thursday, 16 July 1998. From: Judy Lewis <judy.m.lewis@clear.net.nz> Date: Wednesday, 15 Jul 1998 07:32:31 +1200 Subject: 9.0645 The New Globe 1998 Comment: Re: SHK 9.0645 The New Globe 1998 > Authenticity Disregarded: last season's Henry V used male actors for > the female roles, and it worked in the context of that play (which has > few female characters and none in leading parts), and for the purpose > of showing us as closely as possible what the original looked like. I am rather dubious about the total success of the all-male production of Henry V - at least for the performance I saw. The groundlings were encouraged to be as noisy and responsive as it is supposed they were in Shakespeare's day - and that is OK with me - but modern audiences, especially young people, do not have sufficient experience to know how to respond appropriately. In this production, Mistress Quickly was played as a comic drag act, and got huge laughs. I am happy to accept that this is 'authentic'; I doubt if it is a C20 idea for men to be inordinately amused at seeing other men wearing false breasts. Unfortunately, when the splendid young man playing Princess Katherine came on, he was received in a similar manner by the largely teenage (school party) groundlings - and this, I am certain, is not what Shakespeare would have intended or wanted. The wooing scene in this play is one of Shakespeare's most delightful and Katherine must be taken seriously as a 'woman' if it is to be truly appreciated. To have a rowdy 'nudge nudge wink wink' audience response is to destroy the magic.
|
|
|||||