• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Some Notes on the CSF Hamlet"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.1009.  Monday, 6 October 1997.

[1]     From:   Jerry Bangham <jbangham@kudzu.win.net>
        Date:   Sunday, 05 Oct 1997 15:03:46 -0400
        Subj:   Conference in England

[2]     From:   Louis C Swilley <lcsswill@tenet.edu>
        Date:   Sunday, 5 Oct 1997 16:15:15 -0500 (CDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 8.1005  Re: TN

[3]     From:   Louis C Swilley <lcsswill@tenet.edu>
        Date:   Sunday, 5 Oct 1997 16:15:15 -0500 (CDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 8.1005  Re: TN

[4]     From:   Stephan B. Paragon <PARAGON860@aol.com>
        Date:   Sunday, 5 Oct 1997 21:38:54 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 8.0998  Q: MND


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Jerry Bangham <jbangham@kudzu.win.net>
Date:           Sunday, 05 Oct 1997 15:03:46 -0400
Subject:        Conference in England

>I am looking for information on conferences in London, England.  I hope
>there will be a conference of about a week's duration this winter or
>spring.

If you can settle for a conference in Canterbury in the Summer, the
International Federation for Theatre Research will be meeting July 6 -
12. There will undoubtedly be some sessions related to Shakespeare.

The conference will include a day's excursion to London (including the
Globe) and probably a post-convention trip somewhere in the UK.

There is a link with contact information on my website.

Jerry Bangham
Internet: jbangham@kudzu.win.net
http://www.win.net/~kudzu/y

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Louis C Swilley <lcsswill@tenet.edu>
Date:           Sunday, 5 Oct 1997 16:15:15 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: 8.1005  Re: TN
Comment:        Re: SHK 8.1005  Re: TN

Remember those
> Puritans who called Christmas Christtide because they hated celebratory
> masses so much?

Your remark reminds of a favorite story of my old English professor (or
happy memory):  In the last century, a member of Parliament, one Thomas
Massey-Massey, called for the suppression of the term, "Christmas,"
because of its Roman Catholic background.  He favored "Christtide"
instead, and presented this idea before the assembled Members. The idea
died, however, when some wag of an Irish M.P. rose to say that he would
be perfectly willing to endorse the measure, if the English gentleman
would change his own name to Thotide Tidey-Tidey.

L. Swilley

[3]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Peter L Groves <Peter.Groves@arts.monash.edu.au>
Date:           Monday, 06 Oct 1997 09:50:46 +0000
Subject: 8.0994  Re: Pronunciation; Shrew; Two Questions
Comment:        Re: SHK 8.0994  Re: Pronunciation; Shrew; Two Questions

> Can't stand the term "feminine" endings, by the way, although I still
> find it used.  How about some alternatives?

I agree -- I always call it a "double" ending.

Peter Groves, Monash

[4]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Stephan B. Paragon <PARAGON860@aol.com>
Date:           Sunday, 5 Oct 1997 21:38:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 8.0998  Q: MND
Comment:        Re: SHK 8.0998  Q: MND

I think you should have only imaginary minds in on creating the play. It
must be as imaginative as possible.

• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "(no subject)"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Some Notes on the CSF Hamlet"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]