![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1997: Re: Various Re: Hamlet
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 07/11/97
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.0750. Friday, 11 July 1997. From: Ron Ward <rgward@actrix.gen.nz> Date: Friday, 11 Jul 1997 15:21:22 +1200 (NZST) Subject: 8.0746 Various Re: Hamlet Comment: Re: SHK 8.0746 Various Re: Hamlet In the various discussions on Hamlet's feigned or real madness no one has attempted to classify it as legal or clinical madness. Not terribly relevant to S, to whom such a distinction would probably be meaningless; the McNaughton rules being some centuries away. However, Macbeth defined it in a way that one eminent psychologist (Eysenik I think) thought was helpful. Perhaps some one could quote the exact reference but it went something like "Madness! why tis nothing but to be mad"
|
|
|||||