![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1997: Qs: OED; Caliban
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.BowieState.edu) Date: 04/24/97
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.0495. Thursday, 24 April 1997.
[1] From: Hugh Davis <hhd@email.unc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 23 Apr 1997 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subj: Off-topic: OED
[2] From: Kathleen Breen <kathleen@MIS.Net>
Date: Wednesday, 23 Apr 1997 21:38:34 +0000
Subj: [Q: Caliban]
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Davis <hhd@email.unc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 23 Apr 1997 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Off-topic: OED
I know this is off-topic, but does anyone on this list know if the OED
has ever been put on a CD-ROM? It seems like a natural (if that term
can be applied) step for the project to take-a cd set could hold the
information of many volumes. It also might be a more affordable
edition.
Just curious,
Hugh Davis
hhd@email.unc.edu
[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kathleen Breen <kathleen@MIS.Net>
Date: Wednesday, 23 Apr 1997 21:38:34 +0000
Subject: [Q: Caliban]
Having read conflicting criticisms on <The Tempest>, some students in my
Shakespeare class have raised questions about the character of Caliban.
Some critics examine the character from a Primitivist point of view,
saying that Caliban represents innocence, a version of the noble savage
untarnished by civilization. Others take a more medieval Christian view,
saying that Caliban is untouched by grace. As a "monster," i.e. a
creature of mixed species, he is not fully human and does not even have
a soul. I'm familiar with the idea that both Caliban and Ariel reflect
dimensions of Prospero's personality (This thing of darkness I
acknowledge mine.") I'd be interested in hearing other current ideas on
Caliban. Is he viewed as essentially good? essentially evil? neither?
Thanks,
Kathleen Breen
|
|
|||||