![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1996: Re: Last Lines of Lear
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 12/17/96
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, SHK 7.0952. Tuesday, 17 December 1996.
(1) From: Steve Urkowitz <SURCC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Date: Sunday, 15 Dec 96 09:36:15 EST
Subj: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 12 Dec 1996 to 13 Dec 1996
(2) From: Porter Jamison <shaxpere@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sunday, 15 Dec 1996 07:55:22 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 7.0948 Re: Last Lines of Lear
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Urkowitz <SURCC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Date: Sunday, 15 Dec 96 09:36:15 EST
Subject: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 12 Dec 1996 to 13 Dec 1996
Last Lines in LEAR:
When weighing the alternative appeals of who gets to say the last speech in
LEAR, it may help if you look at all the other speech-prefixes that bounce from
one character to another, particularly in the final scene. As with the other
"multiple-text" plays, whoever was doing the multiplying performed patterned
and dramaatically potent series of changes. (Shakespeare's Revision of KL
[1980])
Any individual textual alternative may be talked about in isolation, of course,
but they take on greater "authority" (dare I say it?) when seen in their larger
contexts.
As ever,
Steve UrQuartowitz, City College of New York
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Porter Jamison <shaxpere@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sunday, 15 Dec 1996 07:55:22 -0800
Subject: 7.0948 Re: Last Lines of Lear
Comment: Re: SHK 7.0948 Re: Last Lines of Lear
I once read that Albany was assigned the lines by some editors because he was
the character onstage with the highest rank-- so many of Shakespeare's plays,
and all of the other tragedies (as per my memory anyway) follow this general
convention.
|
|
|||||