![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1996: Re: "Respecting"
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 10/05/96
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, SHK 7.0724. Saturday, 5 October 1996. From: David Evett <R0870%TAONODE@VMCMS.CSUOHIO.EDU> Date: Thursday, 03 Oct 1996 14:32 ET Subject: "respecting": Shakes Comment: SHK 7.0718 "respecting": Shakes Three marks to Frank Whigham for reminding us that Shakespeare was and still should be Entertainment Tonight--one problem with filling people up with politics, as Gabriel Egan apparently wishes to do, is that all the fun gets squeezed out in the process, and what's left has a lot of dry, harsh, indigestible fiber in it. This is not to say that people should not be encouraged to notice that the plays _don't_ pay much attention to prostitutes. Though does anybody besides me remember Martha Henry's terrifying Doll Tearsheet in a Stratford, Ont. 2H4 15 or so years ago? I can still visualize the savage gesture with which she whipped the concealed knife from her boot to keep 3 very much larger and younger constables very busy for 20 seconds or before she was dragged off the stage. Now that's entertainment! Which happened also to condense and focus a lot of socio-economic reality, not just because Henry is a brilliant actor but because there are things in that text that foster such a reading of that beat. Entertainedly, Dave Evett
|
|
|||||