![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1996: Re: Lines per Character
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 10/03/96
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, SHK 7.0717. Thursday, 3 October 1996.
(1) From: Herman Asarnow <asarnow@uofport.edu>
Date: Monday, 30 Sep 1996 19:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 7.0712 Q: Lines per character
(2) From: Steve Urkowitz <SURCC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Oct 96 21:37:27 EDT
Subj: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 29 Sep 1996 to 30 Sep 1996
(3) From: Norm Holland <NNH@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 02 Oct 96 13:36:29 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 7.0713 Re: Lines per Character
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Herman Asarnow <asarnow@uofport.edu>
Date: Monday, 30 Sep 1996 19:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 7.0712 Q: Lines per character
Comment: Re: SHK 7.0712 Q: Lines per character
As I recall, the # of lines of the major characters of 1HIV is listed in one of
the introductions at the beginning of the Pelican Shakespeare. I remember that
the # of lines of Falstaff, Hal, and Hotspur are nearly the same.
Herman Asarnow
University of Portland
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Urkowitz <SURCC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Oct 96 21:37:27 EDT
Subject: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 29 Sep 1996 to 30 Sep 1996
The multivolume Spevack Concordance has lines numbered and indeed concorded.
But it's been too long since I've had one of those fat tomes in hand to
remember much more. Is't possible to get that line information from the
various search engines on our different e-texts? Must be!
(3)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Norm Holland <NNH@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 02 Oct 96 13:36:29 EDT
Subject: 7.0713 Re: Lines per Character
Comment: Re: SHK 7.0713 Re: Lines per Character
Many thanks to all of you who sent me leads for finding number of lines per
character. You've been a real help. As a reader-response critic, I have to
confess some amusement at how these countings vary from authority to authority,
T. J. King, Harbage, Rolfe, Spevack. That's inevitable, I suppose, given the
editorial problems of lineation. Still, it suggests a real limit to what non
reader-response critics consider as "there."
Again, thanks, and thanks to Hardy Cook for running this excellent list.
--Norm Holland
|
|
|||||