![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1995: Re: Nothing -- Stevens/Lear
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@BOE00.MINC.UMD.EDU) Date: 11/22/95
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 6, No. 0912. Wednesday, 22 Nov.
1995.
(1) From: Peter Herman <PeterHerma@aol.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Nov 1995 09:54:36 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 6.0907 Qs: Stevens/Lear;
(2) From: Joan Hartwig <ENG013@UKCC.uky.edu>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Nov 95 15:04:49 EST
Subj: Re: W.Stevens and Lear [nothing]
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Herman <PeterHerma@aol.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Nov 1995 09:54:36 -0500
Subject: 6.0907 Qs: Stevens/Lear;
Comment: Re: SHK 6.0907 Qs: Stevens/Lear;
Concerning the inquiry on "nothing," see "King Lear and Negation," by
Edward Tayler, _English Literary Renaissance 20.1 (1990). See also
Rosalie Colie's _Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of
Paradox." Hope this helps.
Peter C. Herman
Dept. of English
Georgia State U
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joan Hartwig <ENG013@UKCC.uky.edu>
Date: Tuesday, 21 Nov 95 15:04:49 EST
Subject: Re: W.Stevens and Lear [nothing]
Alan C. Taylor asks for sources on the question of "nothing" in
Shakespeare. A few references I have at hand are
Paul A. Jorgensen, "Much Ado About *Nothing*," SQ, 5 (1954):287-95.
Sigurd Burckhardt, "King Lear: The Quality of Nothing," *Minnesota
Review*
2 (1961):33-50.
Robert F. Fleissner, "The 'Nothing' Element in *King Lear*," SQ, 13
(1962):
67-70.
Rosalie L. Colie, *Paradoxia Epidemica* (Princeton, 1966), 470-81.
G. Wilson Knight, *The Crown of Life*, p. 82, n.1.
Oldies but goodies.
|
|
|||||