![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1995: *Lear*: Ending and Pagan Gods
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 04/19/95
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 6, No. 0322. Wednesday, 19 April 1995.
(1) From: Bruce J. McIver <3074bmac@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 19 Apr 1995 00:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
(2) From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Date: Wednesday, 19 Apr 95 00:04:57 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bruce J. McIver <3074bmac@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 19 Apr 1995 00:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
Comment: Re: SHK 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
The ending of Lear is pure pain in the original. In my dissertation, "Upon
Such Sacrifices: King Lear and the Late Comedies," I argued that Lear is a kind
of inverted romance and that its ending, as the negative does the positive,
anticipates the endings of most of the romances.
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Date: Wednesday, 19 Apr 95 00:04:57 EDT
Subject: 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
Comment: Re: SHK 6.0313 *Lear* Ending and Question
Pagan Gods in Lear:
Lear doesn't refer or swear by pagan gods after III.iv in <Lear>, if I recall;
Kent's "Now, by Apollo, King, thou swear'st thy gods in vain." (I.i.106) gives
the clue: he must be weaned from his addiction to false gods. After the h eath
scene, III.iv. where Lear ushers Kent and the Fool into the hovel before
himself, we see the journey though madness paralleled by a schooled spirit that
no longer invokes ineffectual pagan dieties. Somewhere in SQ there's an
article to this effect. Good luck.
|
|
|||||