![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1993: Re: The Human Condition
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 12/17/93
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 953. Friday, 17 December 1993. From: Al Cacicedo <ALC@JOE.ALB.EDU> Date: Friday, 17 Dec 1993 1:14:38 -0500 (EST) Subject: 4.0948 Re: The Human Condition Comment: RE: SHK 4.0948 Re: The Human Condition There's a wonderful book by Italo Calvino, called *Mr. Palomar*, in one chapter of which the hapless title character wanders through some Toltec ruins while a learned friend discourses on all they are seeing and at the same time Palomar and the friend overhear an unknown schoolteacher tell his class, "no se sabe lo que quiere decir," that no one knows what it all meant to the Toltecs. Being as he is, Mr. Palomar begins to wonder what exactly death (if that's what the bas relief skulls signify) and resurrection (if that's what the carved serpents signify) actually meant in the cognitive economy of the Toltecs. For the purposes of the novel, and for all I know for the purposes of archaeology as well, such knowledge, essentially a translation of one discursive system into another, remains impossible. I think that that's what the historicists tell us. What the humanists tell us is that nevertheless those images seek to address the (for me) only constant for all human beings in all human communities, that at our backs we always hear the eternal footman snicker and, in short, it puzzles the will. Literary scholars and other humans, I think, have to be like Mr. Palomar at the moment he pays attention simultaneously to his friend and to the schoolteacher. We are contingent, historical creatures who transcend our contingency by recognizing our historicity. By the way, puzzled though my will may be, whenever I read a paper such as the one on *Paradise Lost* that I just read by my absolutely first-rate student, I say, huzzah! Exhaustedly, Al Cacicedo (alc@joe.alb.edu) Albright College
|
|
|||||