SHAKSPER 1993: Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare

From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu)
Date: 11/06/93


Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 724.  Saturday, 6 November 1993.
 
(1)     From:   Terence Hawkes <HAWKES@TAFF.CARDIFF.AC.UK>
        Date:   Friday, 5 Nov 93  15:21 GMT
        Subj:   RE: SHK 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
 
(2)     From:   William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH.SAN.UC.EDU>
        Date:   Friday, 05 Nov 1993 22:55:45 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Terence Hawkes <HAWKES@TAFF.CARDIFF.AC.UK>
Date:           Friday, 5 Nov 93  15:21 GMT
Subject: 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
Comment:        RE: SHK 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
 
Cary Mazer refers to 'the script that we have inherited' of Macbeth. Where
is it? What does it look like?
 
Terence Hawkes
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH.SAN.UC.EDU>
Date:           Friday, 05 Nov 1993 22:55:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0718  Re: "Versions" of Shakespeare
 
Just a question: does James Joyce's ULYSSES have a kind of exclussive validity
that Shakespeare's MACBETH lacks?
 
Yours, Bill Godshalk



about SHAKSPER | current postings | submitted papers | browse SHAKSPER | search SHAKSPER
 
Copyright © 2002, Hardy M. Cook, design by Eric Luhrs. All rights reserved.