![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1993: *Coriolanus* Ban
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 10/09/93
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 646. Saturday, 9 October 1993. From: Balz Engler <engler@urz.unibas.ch> Date: Saturday, 9 Oct 1993 19:43:56 +0100 Subject: Shakespeare and Politics Comment: SHK 4.0637 Shakespeare and Politics Re: Coriolanus in Germany (1) We should remember that plays are always used for a purpose in a production--even if the purpose is the glorification of a "timeless" classic. (2) The American authorities were well aware of the political implications of *Coriolanus*, as immediately becomes clear once we move beyond one or two marginal sources in English. I have not had a chance to look into this, but just opening E.L. Stahl's *Shakespeare und das deutsche Theater* (Stuttgart 1947) on p. 732, I found the following paragraph, which I have translated into English: "In the American zone, in which immediately theatre officers were appointed by the occupation authorities, a kind of index was published in the late summer of 1945, as a "suggested reference guide", in which *Hamlet*, *Macbeth*, *Richard III*, *King Lear*, and, under the motto of "the pursuit of happiness", all the comedies are specially mentioned. On the appended "Black List" certain classical works, normally "musts of a good repertory", are designated as unsuitable for a German audience at the present moment, among them *Julius Caesar* and *Coriolanus*, because of its "glorification of dictatorship"." This neatly supports Terry Hawkes's point, doesn't it? Balz Engler University of Basel, Switzerland
|
|
|||||