![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Re: Shakespeare on PBS (Frontline)
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 12/31/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 407. Thursday, 31 December 1992. From: John Mucci <JOHN.C.MUCCI@gte.sprint.com> Date: Monday, 28 Dec 92 17:06:00 UT Subject: RE: Shakespeare on PBS (Frontline) With regard to Ronald Dwelle's comment on the *Frontline* program on the Authorship Issue, I must admit it was not entirely successful in its method of presentation. In no way, however, was the show meant to be a "debate." It would have been a marvellous idea to have Rowse, Schoenbaum, Ogburn, and Powell interacting; but the method of intercutting interviews always gives the appearance of being one-sided. Having produced a three-hour live program this year on the Authorship which did have taped segments as well as a live debate Moderated by William F. Buckley, Jr., I can tell you that it is extremely difficult to present a balanced view on the subject. It is also difficult to separate the crusade or fringe factions which can discredit any topic. Yet there is a core of great interest in the subject pursued by some dedicated scholars working with primary documents, worthy of regard by any of us with a passion for Elizabethan history and literature. The Authorship Question has, I know, alienated some but has created an intense curiosity in the Works of Shakespeare themselves, which is certainly part of our jobs as teachers, and just as much a topic for discussion as, say, Mel Gibson's performance in *Hamlet,* but in no way should it be deemed "foolishness." Life is full of parallels and coincidences, and some of the parallels of Oxford's life and work may be nothing more than that--coincidence--when compared with the works of Shakespeare. But when the coincidences tally into the hundreds and hundreds, you have to stop and think there might be something in all this.
|
|
|||||