![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Another R: MSND Subplots
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 12/07/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 355. Monday, 7 December 1992. From: Kay Stockholder <kay.stockholder@mtsg.ubc.ca> Date: Saturday, 5 Dec 92 17:02:46 PST Subject: Rs: MSND Subplots Comment: SHK 3.0252 Rs: MSND Subplots It's an interesting question. It seems to me that two themes unite the several plots, though I am not sure that the two themes are themselves united. That is, the problems of dealing with the intrinsically irrational, or arational nature of loving, with the changeableness of the human heart at the same time as placing loving marriage at the centre of a viable social order. That takes care of the human lovers and Oberon and Titania, since the fairies' domestic squabbles in the wasteland speech symbolically causes the rest, and Bottom's experience becomes a parodic version of that. The other theme has to do with the nature of stage illusion; it links to the other in that the fairies stage the circumstances in which the young lovers can sort themselves out, and in that the only thing that prevents Pyramus and Thisbe from being a tragedy is the mechanical's inability to understand stage illusion. That is why, I think, the lover and the poet are in the same business. Theseus and Hippolyta provide a different kind of love, as well as establishing the political order in which all the others can be staged. Well, that is a short whirl for a big topic.
|
|
|||||