![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Doubling
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 11/03/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 299. Monday, 2 November 1992. (1) From: Stephen Orgel <orgel@leland.stanford.edu> Date: Monday, Nov. 2, 1992, 19:11:51 PST Subj: doubling (2) From: Balz Engler <engler@urz.unibas.ch> Date: Tuesday, Nov. 3, 1992, 08:58:16 +0100 Subj: SHK 3.0298 More Rs: Doubling Claudius and Ghost (1)--------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Stephen Orgel <orgel@leland.stanford.edu> Date: Monday, Nov. 2, 1992, 19:11:51 PST Subject: doubling If doubling was really a significant device in Shakespeare's theater, why weren't the two twin plays, C of E and 12N, written so they could be doubled? Surely it's we who believe that the actor is the character; so in our twin plays, Jeremy Irons or Bette Davis have to be both twins. Stephen Orgel (2)---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Balz Engler <engler@urz.unibas.ch> Date: Tuesday, Nov. 3, 1992, 08:58:16 +0100 Subject: More Rs: Doubling Claudius and Ghost Comment: SHK 3.0298 More Rs: Doubling Claudius and Ghost Doubling in *Hamlet*. This reminds me of a production of the play I saw in Weimar, in the GDR, in 1972, I think. There the doubling was between the Ghost and Fortinbras. In a post-performance discussion the point was raised whether this was significant, whether this meant a return to the conditions before Claudius's usurpation, that the production had a kind of cyclical Weltbild. This was fiercely denied by the director--after all, the official reading in the GDR at the time was that a new era is dawning at the end of the play. No, it just so happened that the actor doing Fortinbras had fallen ill. This is just an anecdote. But it illustrates, I think, the importance of doubling for interpretation. Balz Engler Basel University, Switzerland engler@urz.unibas.ch
|
|
|||||