![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Dennis Kay's New Biography
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 11/02/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 296. Monday, 2 November 1992. From: Tad Davis <davist@a1.relay.upenn.edu> Date: Monday, Nov. 2, 1992, 09:48:01 -0500 Subject: Dennis Kay's New Biography In my frequently-enacted role of cheerleader, I would like to point out that Dennis Kay's new biography of Shakespeare is widely available. It's not as allusive as Russell Fraser's two-volume life; on the other hand, the sentences are less densely populated, making it a less strenuous reading adventure, and his commentary on the plays seems targeted more to people who either haven't read every play or (like me) can't remember every line of every play. His evocation of Elizabethan London, always a set-piece in biographies of Shakespeare, is particularly well done. He is careful to draw a boundary between fact and speculation, something Fraser often fails to do. Although I haven't tested it on my friends yet, I believe it's far more suitable as a "general" biography than Fraser's or even Schoenbaum's. (Schoenbaum is so scrupulous about sticking to his theme, the documentary record, that ordinary "fans" -- as opposed to fanatics -- can be overwhelmed. But his insistence on hard evidence is an acknowledged influence on Kay, even when it sometimes spoils the story.) There are, unfortunately, a number of printing errors. One severe error seems to be the omission of a whole sentence, if not a whole passage, between page 27 and 28. Page 27 ends with a discussion of Holy Trinity Church, and the phrase: "In the pre-Reformation..." Page 28 begins: "of Worcester, who secured for the townsfolk the right to hold fairs..." The change of subject, besides the obvious garbled syntax, is what makes me think there is more missing than just a word or two. Tad Davis davist@a1.relay.upenn.edu
|
|
|||||