![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Re: Cheap Advice
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 09/04/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 209. Friday, 4 September 1992. From: Steve Urkowitz <SURCC@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> Date: Thursday, Sept. 3, 1992, 23:38:02 EDT Subject: 3.0208 Cheap Advice Comment: Re: SHK 3.0208 Cheap Advice For Larry Schwartz: Yikes! A cry out into the used book marketplace should be able to turn up a copy of the Hinman Facsimile or even one of the notoriously "fixed up" Koekeritz facsimiles of a few decades earlier. But in no way can you consider the Oxford Old Spelling Complete Works as a viable substitute. Well, maybe in some ways. But it just looks, feels, and reads so different, so often, that to me at least it's a whole different vegetable. At the risk of being repetitious, let me say again that the juggling done with the "multiple text plays," especially the Henry Sixes, repeatedly demonstrates that the editors had theatrical tin ears, and the rhythmic and visual codes found in the Oxford Henry Sixes produce painfully inferior music if compared to either the quarto or Folio versions. As for the other modern set of single-play editions, I like David Bevington's, except that too many of the plays appear only bound up with others. If your library's bindery can deal with that, Bevington offers consistently strong introductions and listings of very recent criticism. The Signets do have the advantage of printing a lot of criticism right in the volumes themselves. Barbara Mowat and Paul Werstine are newy editing the Folger series, announced for August '92 but not yet in my corner newstand. But I'd not give up my Hinman for a wilderness of monkeys. Steve Urkowitz, SURCC@CUNYVM
|
|
|||||