![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1992: Query about *Shakespeare Bulletin*
From: Hardy M. Cook (hmcook@boe00.minc.umd.edu) Date: 06/03/92
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 3, No. 117. Wednesday, 3 June 1992. From: David Richman <D_RICHMAN@UNHH.UNH.EDU> Date: Wednesday, June 3, 1992, 10:15:34 -0400 Subject: Query about *Shakespeare Bulletin* Any chance of *Shakespeare Bulletin*, or any other Shakespeare journal, becoming available electronically? Being blind, I relish the increasing availability of electronic texts, since such texts give me and other print- handicapped individuals far greater independence than we have heretofore enjoyed. I address this query to the editors of *Shakespeare Bulletin*, but also to other SHAKSPEReans who may be aware of the availability of additional electronic information. Should *Shakespeare Bulletin* not contemplate an electronic edition, I should like to learn how to acquire a subscription to the inkprint edition. On another matter, I was heartened to read Steve Urkowitz's and Michael Dobson's reservations about the film version of *Henry V*. I had been dismayed by the reverence that the film seemed to have been eliciting. The play, as I read it, brings heroism and doubt into disturbing juxtaposition. For me, the film stirs the bloodlusts with too little reservation. In a Shakespeare class I taught this spring, students read substantial passages from the play--including the entire fourth act. We made no attempt to stage these scenes. We simply read the words aloud, striving for clarity and conviction. The act of reading generated a stimulating and heated discussion--one of the best conversations about this play in which I have ever taken part. Does the film elicit discussion of like complexity? David Richman University of New Hampshire
|
|
|||||