![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1991: Authorship Controversies: Oxford
From: Ken Steele (ksteele@epas.utoronto.ca) Date: 11/07/91
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 2, No. 291. Thursday, 7 Nov 1991. Date: Wed, 6 Nov 91 10:19:32 PST From: kay.stockholder@mtsg.ubc.ca Subject: Authorship: The Earl of Oxford Comment: SHK 2.0286 Authorship: The Earl of Oxford It does make a difference though, because if the Stratford man wrote the plays, as on the whole I think he did, then what we have infused into the plays as a whole is the psyche of one who both envies and despises the world of privilege based on a hierarchical and traditional ideology that on the whole he defends. If the Oxford man wrote them, then we have the psyche of a self-satisfied and privileged person who is free to be deeply critical of the world he inhabits. Apart from arguments based on external evidence, problems of dating, and the like, the internal evidence that for me points toward the Stratford man is the number of self-hating outsiders there are in the plays--Iago, Othello, Hamlet (if one sees him, despite being a prince, as rendered an outsider by Claudius), Caliban, and so on. Even apart from the self-hating characters, the figure of the stranger, after the book by Fiedler, looms so larger than one would think it would if the plays came from the pen of the Oxford man.
|
|
|||||