![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 1991: Responses to Baconian Ciphers
From: Ken Steele (KSTEELE@vm.epas.utoronto.ca) Date: 02/28/91
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 2, No. 72. Thursday, 28 Feb 1991.
(1) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 1991 23:33:04 -0500 (15 lines)
From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Subject: Re: SHK 2.0071 Baconian Theories
(2) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 1991 04:58:54 -0500 (10 lines)
From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Subject: Re: SHK 2.0071 Baconian Theories [2]
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 1991 23:33:04 -0500
From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Subject: 2.0071 Baconian Theories
Comment: Re: SHK 2.0071 Baconian Theories
The question of ciphers, of Baconian or any other source, was firmly--
and wittily--put to rest by the Friedmans in *The Shakespearean Ciphers
Examined* some years ago. The matter is simply of no interest to
Shakespeareans, I would hazard, in whatever form the old lure manifests
itself. I am always a little suspicious (!) of those who show too
much interest in this subject..... No: just kidding. But I think
the Friedmans put all attempts in this area--both past and present--
into the arena of farce. If I recall correctly, they extracted, by the
same principles and practices as claimed by the Baconians, messages such
that Horatio Nelson wrote the plays of Shakespeare. Ah well: it's
late at night, so forgive my acerbic response. Best of British.
Cheers. NR
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------26----
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 1991 04:58:54 -0500
From: Nicholas Ranson <R1NR@AKRONVM>
Subject: 2.0071 Baconian Theories [2]
Comment: Re: SHK 2.0071 Baconian Theories [2]
My immediate response you received late last night when I didn't have
my resources with me. The book should have been: *The Shakespeareran
Ciphers Examined*, by William F. and Elizabeth S. Friedman (Cambridge
U.P.). The sub title was: "An Analysis of Cryptographic Systems Used
as Evidence that Some Author Other than William Shakespeare Wrote the
Plays Commonly Attributed to Him."
[This second message seems to have arrived somewhat damaged. Any errors
in my reconstruction are mine, and not Professor Ranson's. KS]
|
|
|||||