From: Ken Steele (KSTEELE_at_vm.epas.utoronto.ca)
Date: 09/22/90
- Next message: Ken Steele: "Anthologies (22)"
- Previous message: Ken Steele: "Guillaume Chequespierre? (108)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 1, No. 61. Saturday, 22 Sep 1990.
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 90 10:06 EDT
From: "Hardy M. Cook" <HMCOOK@BOE.TOWSON.EDU>
Subject: Anthology Versus Paperbacks
I teach Shakespeare to undergraduate English majors. In past
years, I have required my students to purchase a one-volume
anthology: either Bevington's *Complete Works* or Evans'
*Riverside*. In the spring, I'm planning to use paperback
editions of individual plays for the first time. I would
appreciate any comments on the merits of an anthology versus
paperback editions. I am very aware of the theoretical and
political implications of using an anthology, but I would still
like to hear what others think on the matter.
Hardy M. Cook
Bowie State University
HMCOOK@BOE.TOWSON.EDU
- Next message: Ken Steele: "Anthologies (22)"
- Previous message: Ken Steele: "Guillaume Chequespierre? (108)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |